Thread with 9 posts

jump to expanded post

‪there's this perverse beauty in just how many bad decisions led to that mess. they could've had redundant sensors, they could've made it possible to override it, they could've told pilots it existed, they could've not tried to use software to fix the “feel” of hardware. but no :)‬

Open thread at this post
eta , @eta@eta.st
(open profile)

@hikari I agree the pilots were set up to fail by the automation, but I still think this is within the scope of things they should've been able to handle — that said, as the analysis notes, they weren't trained very well at all, and the system was quite surprising in what it did

Open remote post (opens in a new window)
Tachibana Kanade , @h0m54r@mastodon.social
(open profile)

@hikari AIUI most of those would have pushed it out of the “basically the same plane as before, honest” category meaning it would have needed approval as a new type of plane, which takes longer and costs more

And of course now Boeing have learned their lesson so… are lobbying regulators to let their new improved (but totally still the same, honest) MAX 7 to fly without additional approvals

Open remote post (opens in a new window)