Thread with 4 posts
jump to expanded post
my morally unassailable position on the israel–gaza war is that knowingly creating and maintaining the conditions in which up to two million people are likely starve to death is not defensible under any circumstances and that “genocide” is not an inappropriate word to use for it
we can only hope that the war will end before that many people actually die, and that if they are fed this is not made conditional on expulsion, but it's very hard to be optimistic
oh hey look the icc also thinks starving out a civilian population is bad
https://twitter.com/intlcrimcourt/status/1792511246769570084
if you were waiting for the moment when a respectable liberal institution would speak up and give you moral clarity then this is it, i guess.