Thread with 13 posts

jump to expanded post

@mcc @SoniEx2 hahaha i was actually thinking right now that i might want to do something along these lines for an actually good reason: the os would try to not break your shit when upgrading, but would only make this promise for your windows stuff. if you want linux stuff it'd make sense to have it in a container, at which point it must start feeling a lot like wsl…

Open thread at this post
mcc , @mcc@mastodon.social
(open profile)

@hikari @SoniEx2 Well what I am thinking is that "WSL" can already mean multiple things (WSL1/WSL2) so if you expose the wsl interface (e.g., wslpath.exe, maybe use same mount points for win32 drive) then people who're already accustomed to making use of WSL will just find it is a drop in replacement vs what they're used to

Like maybe you could do BETTER than wsl but cross compatibility could lead to wins. Sometimes in my Windows tools I include "and here's how to use it from WSL" steps

Open remote post (opens in a new window)