Thread with 8 posts

jump to expanded post
demize , @demize@unstable.systems
(open profile)

@hikari honestly this has a lot of overlap with the common gotcha I get when I talk about electoral reform in Canada

โ€œbut if we do what youโ€™re saying we should do, a lot of the time your guys will have less power, and the guys you hate will have more power!โ€ yes, random person I wish I was making up, that is in fact the point. I donโ€™t have to agree with, like, or want your viewpoint for it to be valuable, because there is value inherent to it being different and incompatible with mine

Open remote post (opens in a new window)
Cat! , @Catriona@tech.lgbt
(open profile)

@hikari I think of it like with stereotypes. We all use stereotypes to create mental models in the absence of further information. But what happens when further information arrives, especially if it conflicts with the stereotypes? Well, then we have a choice: we can either accommodate (change our mental model to fit the new information) or assimilate (change the new information to fit our mental model).

And the same applies to society. I would rather call myself pro-accommodationist than anti-assimilationist, even if in a lot of cases that's the same thing. I think if people don't fit, it's far more often our (society's) job to make space for them to fit than it is to demand they fit.

Open remote post (opens in a new window)