Thread with 57 posts

jump to expanded post

it is so incredibly strange. there is this whole existentially terrifying egregore that i was a part of, in many different shapes and forms, that defined some great half of my emotional existence and online experiences for so many years, but now it is gone along with the memories

Open thread at this post

fun fact is that "makes the barriers go up in the mind" is an immediate giveaway that i speak other european languages and don't purely exist in an anglophone cultural space. this is called inalienable posession and i keep phrasing stuff like this, using "the" instead of "your"

Open thread at this post

oh, also: a friend has reminded me, as she often tends to do, that this kind of suspicion exists for a good reason, and i am lucky that i have lost it without it fucking me up. and i can't disagree with that. the naΓ―vetΓ© of my embrace of the world is not truly naΓ―ve

Open thread at this post

as much as i hate to say it, i do think the folks who want certain profoundly psychoactive substances [which i didn't use to get here btw] to be illegal are actually right, even though the people who want them to be legal are also right. i can't claim to know the best compromise

Open thread at this post

oh, a possible name for what i'm describing might be a like… β€œpsychological immune response”. people describe this kind of thing something like this? i have not lost my psychic immune system, but i think it was overactivated and has downregulated a bit these days, for better

Open thread at this post

now, what are β€œother tools” for defending against β€œhostile psychoflora”, hikari? thank you for asking. i imagine they would be the same ones that we use to deal with real-world diseases when the immune system isn't enough: isolation and compartmentalisation.

Open thread at this post

wait people call these psychofauna normally right? uhh. i'm not sure if viruses are fauna or flora. i'll stick with psychoflora for the moment because it sounds prettier and i like it more.

anyway: there's this thing called β€œdissociation” that achieves compartmentalisation

Open thread at this post
✧✦Catherine✦✧ , @whitequark@mastodon.social
(open profile)

@erincandescent @hikari i think it's vital to have a source like that, yeah, but i also think that MDMA in particular has a way to be uniquely psychologically dangerous in ways most things available from a pharmacy aren't--for the exact same reason it's useful

i dunno what a solution is. i wouldn't fight against its availability, of course.

Open remote post (opens in a new window)
R , @r@glauca.space
(open profile)

@erincandescent @whitequark @hikari having previously followed these debates, what hikari is suggesting seems vaguely what Oregon tried to do with psilocybin facilitators (who are not medical or mental health workers), but they obviously still had to America-brain it up. what erin is suggesting seems to be one of the legalization stances we saw typically coming from european activists

Open remote post (opens in a new window)
✧✦Catherine✦✧ , @whitequark@mastodon.social
(open profile)

@hikari part of me wants to say "absolutely" while part of me knows that in a lot of places doctors are far less monstrous than they are in the west

i know how i _feel_ about this but i also don't _know_

fun fact: the only doctors in [redacted] who've treated us poorly were... the doctors in the gender clinic. everyone else were at least very professional, before or after changing the gender marker

Open remote post (opens in a new window)
R , @r@glauca.space
(open profile)

@hikari is the concern "just" "suggestibility"? in our experience, that... doesn't actually work in any of the remotely direct ways (although what can/does work would be intentionally shaping someone's "information environment" (to steal a term from Irenes) *surrounding* the usage of the substances)

Open remote post (opens in a new window)
Manfred , @mandelhorn@mastodon.social
(open profile)

@hikari The suspicion exists for a reason, but it will also warp your perception to see more of what you are looking for. It's a tradeoff. And it's not suspicion's fault. Suspicion, doubt, mistrust, are tools, which, like all tools, need *you* to know "How much of this is a good amount to apply? How little would be too little so that it gives me no benefit because it never warns me of anything, and how much is too much, so that it again gives me no benefit because it just beeps at everything?"

Open remote post (opens in a new window)
R , @r@glauca.space
(open profile)

@hikari dunno, we're still trying to find it. the thing is, we distinctly remember living in the magic. it was *while* we were *in* the all-consuming worldview that we consistently had it. we didn't leave of our own choosing, we were essentially forced out by capital-P Politicalβ„’ forces, but now we can no longer return

Open remote post (opens in a new window)
R , @r@glauca.space
(open profile)

@hikari one problem with most of our conversations with people in our circles nowadays is that none of these people actually got to experience that past edition of us

our life very well could've gone completely differently, possibly up to and including not being a girl-shaped creature

Open remote post (opens in a new window)