Thread with 19 posts
jump to expanded postwhy is anki for macos half a gigabyte in size. it's a fucking flashcard viewer
my most millennial opinion is that if your app needs more than 100MB there's probably something wrong
and ideally it should be a tenth or a hundredth of that
pro tip if you're bundling the qt libraries with your app only bundle the ones you're actually using, qt is an everything framework
better yet consider static linking (is this heretical of me to say)
@erincandescent for a proprietary app, sure, but anki is open-source?
@erincandescent hell, the core parts of qt are lgpl, so even proprietary apps can statically link if they provide unlinked binaries (iirc that's the lgpl stipulation)
But probably the developers didn't build Qt from source
@erincandescent maybe they should build it from source tbh, dealing with the qt company's bullshit makes me want to do that if i need to use qt in a future project
@hikari Don't you know that modern apps need to include at least one copy of Chromium (and I'm not kidding about "at least" β I've got programs that use both CEF and WebView2).
Like for a while it used Bazel, which pretty much nobody wants to touch.
@lanodan bazel is a pretty popular build system though
@hikari Iβve never seen a svelte binary for a cross-platform gui on OSX.
@0xabad1dea this is because nobody packages qt properly
@hikari
β’ 65MB of AV codecs and graphics libraries
β’ 45MB of PyQt6
β’ 75MB of the core anki binary
β’ 270MB of Qt frameworks
@porglezomp @hikari I figured that was the case - if a reference is worth making, it's worth committing to fully.
Speaking of which, in response your request to spend less on ~~candles~~ ~~AWBW artillery~~ QT:
"no"
:3