Thread with 66 posts

jump to expanded post

think i'll rewatch rebuild of evangelion because a friend mentioned shikinami asuka and it's been an eternity since we saw the first three films so we don't remember how her characterisation has changed. also we still haven't seen the fourth movie so this is finally our chance

Open thread at this post

instead of just re-releasing evangelion in hd with the original film grain they have to destroy culture by pointlessly reanimating it in horrible 2010's widescreen. look at how dead this still looks. in this essay i will—

Open thread at this post

oh wait oh my god this is the first time in our life that we have realised that the “N2 mine” is what you would call a “tactical nuclear weapon”. when gendou says “conventional weapons” (通常兵器) won't work, that's the implication. we always thought it was a cool new explosive

Open thread at this post

the earlier tweet was a joke but nearly 9 minutes in and the "remake"-yness is constantly irritating me a little. it's not as pretty and it just feels a little off sometimes, the way the shots have been changed. i don't know

Open thread at this post

but i'm also finding the particular choice of subtitle font (left) is putting me in the wrong mood. luckily this release has uh. a huge selection of different sub tracks mashed into it (don't ask), each with different fonts, so i'm just picking another one (right).

Open thread at this post

when rendering that clip i didn't realise at first i had to request a downmix from 6.1 to 2.0, and in the process discovered that you can easily get a mix where there's just the background music, no speech. that's kind of cool. i think i might like to watch a whole movie that way

Open thread at this post

the “requisitioning the entirety of japan's electrical supply” thing is famously cool but i also can't help but think about how you simply can't use an entire nation's electricity supply in one place at one time because there just isn't the transfer capacity

Open thread at this post

really the coolest thing about that is the idea that an entire nation's industrial might can be commandeered to improvise multiple pieces of a solution to a problem in the space of less than 24 hours. alas in the real world even a timeframe of months is optimistic

Open thread at this post

despite my complaints i did get into the flow of it once i was maybe half an hour in. it did move me a bit in the way that the original evangelion does. i'm not sure how i feel about the positron cannon segment of the film though. it felt weak somehow

Open thread at this post

…the original series has Cruel Angel's Thesis and the rebuild does not. that's a huge point to the original right there. it's really strange to think i've just watched what's supposedly equivalent the first few episodes of evangelion, but without that OP

Open thread at this post

evangelion 1.11 reproduces a lot line-for-line, shot-for-shot, scene-for-scene, so it you could watch it having last seen the original over two decades ago in your youth (i.e. being the target audience) and feel like you're rewatching it, like you've seen it before

Open thread at this post

but it's not the same thing…

visually it loses something and it gains something. we really love the authentic hand-drawn, hand-painted, film grain look of the original series. of course, we are watching a BD digital re-release that re-scans the negatives, not 480i analogue TV

Open thread at this post

evangelion 1.11 is from the digital age and so it just doesn't have that "realness" to it in that particular way. what it does have is being made for a big, wide screen, not a small 4:3 one, and the vividness of digital colour. it does have some soul to it, if in a different way

Open thread at this post

one example of a visual change in 1.11 that i think is a true improvement is the psychedelic visuals when shinji enters the eva for the first time and it's synchronising with his brain. that was something they didn't have the technology to pull off before. they sell it better now

Open thread at this post

but the biggest difference between 1.11 and the original series is this experiential quality i struggle to convey. the former is a movie and the latter is not, and the flow is very different as a result, even without them re-ordering things and cutting out certain little moments

Open thread at this post

i don't think i like the little wink-wink nudge-nudge things like how they changed SEELE's conversations with Gendou. i don't like watching a remake movie that assumes you are a capital-f Fan of the thing it's remaking. it makes me feel a sadness i can't really describe

Open thread at this post

evangelion 1.11 made me feel things, different things to rewatching the original series, and i did find myself absorbed by it for most of the running length, so i do think it succeeds as a film, and i do think i liked it.

Open thread at this post

this isn't evangelion. i'm not sure what it is, but it's not evangelion. i don't think they want me to think it's evangelion either. the way they use 3dcg here is very different from the previous film, it must be deliberate

Open thread at this post

a friend remarked to me ahead of me watching this that that this film has nonstop intimacy, almost like the opposite of the original series, and unfortunately we can't tell you how we'd perceive this if we hadn't heard that comment, but boy are we noticing it only 24 minutes in

Open thread at this post

it feels like a blorboified, flanderised evangelion almost. like yes this character looks and talks like shinji, and this other character looks and talks like asuka, but it's just. it's … unnatural? they want me to feel they're the same, but they're in such a different context?

Open thread at this post

i know she's not "asuka" because this is "shikinami" and not "souryuu", but like. saying "baka shinji" doesn't make you asuka. it's not the catchphrase that makes the character. i feel uncomfortable

Open thread at this post

gaaaaaaah lines like “you're not the only one who's got it tough” (kaji's remark to shinji) really piss me off because they rest on a conception of a character that doesn't feel consistent with the actual world of the film

Open thread at this post

i don't like the new visual direction in this film, the visual readability and comprehensibility of what's happening on screen is a lot worse than both the previous movie and the original series, our brain can't process what's going on in these action scenes

Open thread at this post

I think we last (first) watched the first three rebuild films ten+ years ago, so we don't remember much, but we definitely were frustrated that they felt essentially skeletal, lacking the depth of the original series and falling back on presumed viewer familiarity with it

Open thread at this post

and I mention it because I'm feeling it really strongly again this time. I'm trying to be open-minded, I really am, but it's getting at me. it doesn't bother me as a technicality, it's not critical pedantry, it bothers me because I can't process the world being presented as real

Open thread at this post

given I complained about Asuka twice, I should add that Rei's characterisation was similarly grating, and she isn't ostensibly a "different character" in this movie. I think Shinji's probably would be too if he weren't so protagonist-shaped (I don't know what I mean by that)

Open thread at this post

this is a truly insulting comparison so I must apologise for making it, but in essence I disliked Evangelion 2.22 for similar reasons to why I disliked Chou Kaguya-hime. they are both incredibly uncomfortably hypertextual, if in very different ways.

okay that's all I gotta sleep

Open thread at this post