Thread with 26 posts

jump to expanded post

‪who is the audience? i don't think it benefits someone with impaired sight, because they can still appreciate the work. does it benefit someone who has been blind their whole life? it conveys to them what i “see” in a photo, but they will never be able to interpret it themselves?‬

Open thread at this post
Ninji , @Ninji@wuffs.org
(open profile)

@hikari i’ve struggled with this a lot (i post a lot of photos) but have tried to force myself to do it anyway

my usual thought process is “is there an aspect of this photo that i want to emphasise, or where i’d be disappointed if someone glanced at it and didn’t notice it”

so e.g. if i’ve posted an image that i think is funny because of weird font usage, i’ll explain that in the alt text, but if the font choices are otherwise irrelevant, i won’t mention them at all

Open remote post (opens in a new window)
demize , @demize@unstable.systems
(open profile)

@hikari you have independently come up with the exact reason that the “you must provide alt-text for everything” discourse is so awful; it’s bizarrely laser-focused and it puts a large burden on people posting that often just results in either people not posting or people stopping doing alt-text entirely

it’s not actually mandatory though, and it being good doesn’t mean its absence is worth being mad about

Open remote post (opens in a new window)