Thread with 15 posts
jump to expanded post
oh my god there is an æsthetic/philosophical/technical commonality between my interests in General MIDI and in fixed-function 3D rendering pipelines. help. i am too good at a certain kind of meta-thinking
wait that's a pretty obvious overlap sdggjfkfl
it does mean though that if i come up with some sort of Justification for why this is The Correct Way i could kind of effortlessly transfer it though, which is probably not a good thing lmao
i think what i'm saying is i like ways of creating art that ground you, where the technology itself constrains what you do in certain fundamental ways, allowing you to fully express yourself in others without suffering choice paralysis
another way to put this is that everything i put out would make no sense whatsoever if unconstrained. it would be purely psychedelic
okay i'll log off for a bit oops
it is the LANGUAGE of the CONSTRAINTS within which MEANING can be CONSTRUCTED
WITHOUT THE IMPOSITION OF CONSTRAINTS CONSCIOUSLY OR UNCONSCIOUSLY NO MEANING CAN BE COMMUNICATED
@saagar no :)
@hikari now THIS is Posting (positive) :D
@scarlet :3
@hikari the imposition of the initial set of constraints is identical to an individual consciousness' becoming (out of an infinite space of undifferentiated thought)
but the emergence of these constraints causally precedes the emergence of the 1stPersonPerspective (assuming linear time anyway) and this is pretty much how the entire reality is hallucinated
without constraints no meaning can *exist*; also without them no meaning is *necessary* (still refusing to wrap my head around that one)
@hikari famously, the infinite library contains no information for this reason!
@estelle precisely! i came to essentially the same thought through a different lens: i don't like the algorithmic relating of all content by proximity, because this is ultimately destructive of contextual meaning