Thread with 16 posts

jump to expanded post

someday i will rant about this. today is not that day. suffice to say that while CREATIVE® SoundFont® technology is okay at General MIDI and offers some fun creative possibilities, it was never good at GM extensions like Roland's GS and Yamaha's XG, and i love those, so i hate it

Open thread at this post

that's not an ironic use of the trademark symbol btw. SoundFont® is a registered trademark of Creative Technology. and if you're thinking “hey aren't they the company notable for making sound cards in the 1990's” that's because, yes, this is ancient and obsolete technology

Open thread at this post

god i guess one way to explain it is that it's like if you were really into the moog or something and then people are like “oh yeah i love that! i have a moog synthesiser sample library that all my gamer friends tell me sounds the most realistic”. it's not the same instrument

Open thread at this post

people will pour great amounts of effort into making the “best” SC-55-soundalike CREATIVE® SoundFont® file and it'll take up like a hundred times more disk space than the original ROMs did and not even support adjusting the fucking filter cutoff, so it can't play electronic music

Open thread at this post

oops i guess this did turn into a rant. if you want suggestions for what to use instead, well:

  • hardware: Roland Sound Canvas, Yamaha MU, or similar
  • software: Roland Sound Canvas VA (VST), Yamaha S-YXG50, Nuked SC-55

all more powerful than any soundfont can ever be

Open thread at this post

specifically i recommend these if you want accurate playback of 1990's General MIDI/Roland GS/Yamaha XG music or if you want to try to write music for this exciting world that once was. if you just want a way to put 128 instrument samples in a file, SoundFont® is… fine i guess

Open thread at this post