Thread with 14 posts

jump to expanded post

holy shit LinuxJournal is just total AI slop now and I don't mean that in any exaggerated way, there's an article “about” loss32 that is entirely hallucinated statements about what loss32 is that have no resemblance to anything written on the website, it's un-fucking-believable

Open thread at this post

seriously just read this https://web.archive.org/web/20260112165115/https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/introducing-loss32-new-lightweight-linux-distro-focus-legacy-hardware

and then read what would ostensibly be the source https://web.archive.org/web/20260101003131/https://loss32.org/

can you see where any of the statements come from? no? yeah that's because they were pulled out of a chatbot's arse and zero fact-checking was done, period

Open thread at this post

I'm actually pissed off about this article because it hallucinates a project that has exactly the opposite goals to the real project, which is kind of a nightmare when you consider the importance of first impressions. it's not defamation but frankly I think we deserve an apology

Open thread at this post
Tim Chase , @gumnos@bsd.cafe
(open profile)

@jbz @hikari the physical magazine was good in its day, and when they switched to digital-only, I cancelled my subscription. I understand the financial-pressures that led to shuttering the print copies, but I wanted something I could read at the park or in the bathroom without a device. It went downhill pretty quickly from there and has largely become a cesspool of uselessness.

Open remote post (opens in a new window)