Thread with 9 posts
jump to expanded post
holy shit LinuxJournal is just total AI slop now and I don't mean that in any exaggerated way, there's an article “about” loss32 that is entirely hallucinated statements about what loss32 is that have no resemblance to anything written on the website, it's un-fucking-believable
seriously just read this https://web.archive.org/web/20260112165115/https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/introducing-loss32-new-lightweight-linux-distro-focus-legacy-hardware
and then read what would ostensibly be the source https://web.archive.org/web/20260101003131/https://loss32.org/
can you see where any of the statements come from? no? yeah that's because they were pulled out of a chatbot's arse and zero fact-checking was done, period
I'm actually pissed off about this article because it hallucinates a project that has exactly the opposite goals to the real project, which is kind of a nightmare when you consider the importance of first impressions. it's not defamation but frankly I think we deserve an apology
my only guess is that the chatbot only got the name (and potentially the screenshot) of your project
@hikari that's horrible. It's really obvious that it's AI slop too, has that formulaic style with everything built out of lists and bullet points
@hikari lol even by AI standards this is bad. Like this is the shit that ChatGPT came up two years ago with no access to the internet or any external resources.
@guenther yeah exactly. I'm kind of fascinated, these days major services seem to do a web search whether you like it or not, so I wonder how on earth they got it
